🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.